![]() ![]()
Maybe something there identifies the issue, or perhaps it is easiest to file a new issue.The main draw of Foxit Reader is its ability to open PDF files quicker than other readers. GitHub lists numerous issues for "background image": It could be something about the particular way the image is generated by PDFill. So your embedded watermark image is being ignored or rendered transparent for some reason. ![]() If I embed a different image and use Arrange > Move to Back, in Acrobat it is nearly entirely hidden by your watermark image, but in the viewer it is visible. If I open the sample PDF in Acrobat XI, the "watermark" appears to be a huge image (A4-sized). When I search the latter, I don't see this exact problem under "watermark": The pdf.js project is run largely outside of the bug tracking system, so the best way to get changes in there would be through the mailing list or the GitHub issues system. Since it's obviously a long term problem which is not fixed, and you now know about it, do I really need to follow up on the technical forum? Pdf reader mac os fox update#Over a year later the problem persists, in Firefox that is set to automatically update itself and has done so since then.Įven if people can't print PDF content minus watermark they can easily save screen images. ![]() "yes, it is in pdf.js - sorry (I thought it was foxit reader because of an support screenshot which I have received). ![]() I can reproduce it in pdf.js but if you see the problem with foxit reader you need to take it up with them." "Are you talking about pdf.js or embeded foxit reader? That one says filed (nearly 2 years ago). Thanks to both of you for your prompt responses. #Post back here to keep us informed of your progress, including links to the conversations. Ensuring you make the point it is a global Firefox issue with a Firefox default feature and not a site specific problem. #* Initially Ask for advice in where to discuss this mater if not their forum. #* This one would seem approprite to ask about the technical aspects And possibly this one to ask about the watermarks being defeated I've flagged this as offtopic, but I will not lock the post until I know you have found somewhere to discuss this. A bug filed without prior discussion with module owners may well be effectively ignored. You could just file a bug (I could help if necessary) for such a feature, however it would be much better to start a discussion about this first with the people concerned. IIRC Admin Staff on this site agreed to identify and list any such resources, but I don't recall anything being done about that. It is often difficult to find anywhere on Mozilla where they do discuss anything like that retrospectively. Neither do we discuss development decisions and policies. This is not the place for any such discussion about internet rights. Pdf reader mac os fox free#However I could be wrong as there are people who would no doubt argue Firefox should not support watermarks, as that restricts free access to material on the Web. I surmise that it is not a deliberate intention to remove the watermarks but a limitation in the PDF reader's ability to support such a feature. I must immediately say I do not know the first thing about the technical aspects of the Firefx PDF reader.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |